<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shock news just in: Google.co.uk is a bit shit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/shock-news-just-in-google-co-uk-is-a-bit-shit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/shock-news-just-in-google-co-uk-is-a-bit-shit.html</link>
	<description>Look Upon My Works Ye Mighty and Despair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carps</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/shock-news-just-in-google-co-uk-is-a-bit-shit.html/comment-page-1#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Carps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=598#comment-761</guid>
		<description>Yeah... but dude... The BBC... The Times... The (spit!) Guardian? Or even, if you do want to go to Google for that stuff, Google News. Why lump it in with the main SERPs? It gets right on my nelly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230; but dude&#8230; The BBC&#8230; The Times&#8230; The (spit!) Guardian? Or even, if you do want to go to Google for that stuff, Google News. Why lump it in with the main SERPs? It gets right on my nelly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Evison</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/shock-news-just-in-google-co-uk-is-a-bit-shit.html/comment-page-1#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Evison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=598#comment-756</guid>
		<description>Cruise = rubbish.

But arguably most people searching for &quot;legal highs&quot; today are searching for the news on the subject - not seeking a last gasp purchase of slightly shit so-called narcotics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cruise = rubbish.</p>
<p>But arguably most people searching for &#8220;legal highs&#8221; today are searching for the news on the subject &#8211; not seeking a last gasp purchase of slightly shit so-called narcotics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carps</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/shock-news-just-in-google-co-uk-is-a-bit-shit.html/comment-page-1#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Carps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=598#comment-755</guid>
		<description>Hey - SEOs are people too ;)

Sticking so many results based on &#039;freshness&#039; into the rankings still sticks in my craw. I thought the whole point of Google is that it gives me The Best Results - not The Most Recent Results From a Bunch of Powerful Domains... I just don&#039;t think that makes for a good SERP when you just see a tonne of news stories or whatever.

Let&#039;s say the Government bans shoes. Now with QDF, if I search for &#039;shoes&#039; on that day I&#039;m going to see a shitload of news sites and blog posts. But the chances are that I am way more likely to be looking for somewhere to buy shoes, no? Fair enough: if QDF applied to just &quot;shoe ban&quot; or &quot;shoes banned&quot; or whatever that would be good... but doing it for &quot;cruise&quot; or &quot;legal highs&quot; is just making it too wide.

Now. Who wants a coffee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; SEOs are people too <img src='http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sticking so many results based on &#8216;freshness&#8217; into the rankings still sticks in my craw. I thought the whole point of Google is that it gives me The Best Results &#8211; not The Most Recent Results From a Bunch of Powerful Domains&#8230; I just don&#8217;t think that makes for a good SERP when you just see a tonne of news stories or whatever.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say the Government bans shoes. Now with QDF, if I search for &#8216;shoes&#8217; on that day I&#8217;m going to see a shitload of news sites and blog posts. But the chances are that I am way more likely to be looking for somewhere to buy shoes, no? Fair enough: if QDF applied to just &#8220;shoe ban&#8221; or &#8220;shoes banned&#8221; or whatever that would be good&#8230; but doing it for &#8220;cruise&#8221; or &#8220;legal highs&#8221; is just making it too wide.</p>
<p>Now. Who wants a coffee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Whitehouse</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/shock-news-just-in-google-co-uk-is-a-bit-shit.html/comment-page-1#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>David Whitehouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=598#comment-754</guid>
		<description>I guess Google make a search engine for people more than SEO&#039;s ;)

Plus they are trying to offer a service, maintain loyalty but increase profits...

BBC ranking for cruise though is just stupid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Google make a search engine for people more than SEO&#8217;s <img src='http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Plus they are trying to offer a service, maintain loyalty but increase profits&#8230;</p>
<p>BBC ranking for cruise though is just stupid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/shock-news-just-in-google-co-uk-is-a-bit-shit.html/comment-page-1#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=598#comment-753</guid>
		<description>You know what really bugs me? When you see brand results ranking - I think there were a few for &#039;mobile phones&#039; - that aren&#039;t even optimised. Google say &#039;make sure your meta data is descriptive&#039; etc, then blatantly disregard their own guidelines. That sends out a crappy message to everyone and is really unfair to anyone who&#039;s actually bothered to build their site properly. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what really bugs me? When you see brand results ranking &#8211; I think there were a few for &#8216;mobile phones&#8217; &#8211; that aren&#8217;t even optimised. Google say &#8216;make sure your meta data is descriptive&#8217; etc, then blatantly disregard their own guidelines. That sends out a crappy message to everyone and is really unfair to anyone who&#8217;s actually bothered to build their site properly. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

