<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another &#8220;SEO is all about scamming&#8221; piece of bullshit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/another-seo-is-all-about-scamming-piece-of-bullshit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/another-seo-is-all-about-scamming-piece-of-bullshit.html</link>
	<description>Look Upon My Works Ye Mighty and Despair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:04:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carps</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/another-seo-is-all-about-scamming-piece-of-bullshit.html/comment-page-1#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Carps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=800#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>To be fair, the man has &lt;strong&gt;no&lt;/strong&gt; point.

Google has an algorithm that millions of visitors use every day. A top listing in a competitive market means big bucks. Therefore people like us study how Google works and advise businesses how they can get to the top of those rankings. That&#039;s what we call SEO.

Firstly, it&#039;s naive to think that just because your website is &quot;interesting&quot; or &quot;useful&quot; that it will rank ahead of other people who &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; using SEO. Sure, if your business has 4 or 5 years to wait for it to grow naturally then knock yourself out. SEO exists whether he thinks it&#039;s valid or not, so if you want to compete then just get over yourself and pay for an SEO to look things over for you.

Point of example, I&#039;ve been writing this blog for a couple of years now. I use a nice Wordpress format, try to write interestingly and uniquely as often as I can, engage in the comments on other sites and everything else that is &#039;best practice&#039; as described by Powazek. I&#039;ve even written about stuff that no-one else picked up until weeks afterward.

But if this was my business I&#039;d be dead in the water, because I get no traffic. Why not? Because I&#039;ve never really looked after this site from an SEO perspective. It&#039;s always had tonnes of dupe content issues, poor page titles and loads of other stuff you only understand if you&#039;re an SEO. I&#039;ve never sourced authority dofollow links on purpose. All that stuff is where proper, business-level SEO comes into play.

And, realistically, do you look at a competitive sphere and think &quot;the site at #1 is the best&quot; or do you think &quot;the site at #1 has the best SEO&quot;? I know which I think - and while ideally there&#039;s a huge overlap between the two, both of us know that isn&#039;t true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, the man has <strong>no</strong> point.</p>
<p>Google has an algorithm that millions of visitors use every day. A top listing in a competitive market means big bucks. Therefore people like us study how Google works and advise businesses how they can get to the top of those rankings. That&#8217;s what we call SEO.</p>
<p>Firstly, it&#8217;s naive to think that just because your website is &#8220;interesting&#8221; or &#8220;useful&#8221; that it will rank ahead of other people who <em>are</em> using SEO. Sure, if your business has 4 or 5 years to wait for it to grow naturally then knock yourself out. SEO exists whether he thinks it&#8217;s valid or not, so if you want to compete then just get over yourself and pay for an SEO to look things over for you.</p>
<p>Point of example, I&#8217;ve been writing this blog for a couple of years now. I use a nice WordPress format, try to write interestingly and uniquely as often as I can, engage in the comments on other sites and everything else that is &#8216;best practice&#8217; as described by Powazek. I&#8217;ve even written about stuff that no-one else picked up until weeks afterward.</p>
<p>But if this was my business I&#8217;d be dead in the water, because I get no traffic. Why not? Because I&#8217;ve never really looked after this site from an SEO perspective. It&#8217;s always had tonnes of dupe content issues, poor page titles and loads of other stuff you only understand if you&#8217;re an SEO. I&#8217;ve never sourced authority dofollow links on purpose. All that stuff is where proper, business-level SEO comes into play.</p>
<p>And, realistically, do you look at a competitive sphere and think &#8220;the site at #1 is the best&#8221; or do you think &#8220;the site at #1 has the best SEO&#8221;? I know which I think &#8211; and while ideally there&#8217;s a huge overlap between the two, both of us know that isn&#8217;t true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Whitehouse</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/another-seo-is-all-about-scamming-piece-of-bullshit.html/comment-page-1#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>David Whitehouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=800#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>To be fair the man has a point, if you make a website interesting, useful and worth talking about, no amount of SEO can compete.

But SEO has it place, many products are necessary, but also boring. - so they require SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair the man has a point, if you make a website interesting, useful and worth talking about, no amount of SEO can compete.</p>
<p>But SEO has it place, many products are necessary, but also boring. &#8211; so they require SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carps</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/another-seo-is-all-about-scamming-piece-of-bullshit.html/comment-page-1#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Carps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=800#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>A cogently argued point. I chose a right fucking example there, didn&#039;t I? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cogently argued point. I chose a right fucking example there, didn&#8217;t I? <img src='http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obnoxio The Clown</title>
		<link>http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/another-seo-is-all-about-scamming-piece-of-bullshit.html/comment-page-1#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>Obnoxio The Clown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk/?p=800#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>But all politicians &lt;b&gt;ARE&lt;/b&gt; crooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But all politicians <b>ARE</b> crooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
